Front Foot Elevated vs. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squats: Which Is Better?

Split squats are a staple in strength training programs and not just because they’re challenging. These deceptively simple movements pack a punch when it comes to building single-leg strength, improving hip stability, and addressing left-to-right imbalances that often go unnoticed in bilateral lifts. Their roots trace back to early athletic training and physical therapy, where they were used to help athletes regain strength and mobility after injury. But it wasn’t until the rise of functional training in the late 20th century that split squats began earning serious respect as a standalone performance tool.

One version in particular—the rear foot elevated or “Bulgarian” split squat—skyrocketed in popularity in the early 2000s, thanks in large part to Bulgarian Olympic weightlifting coaches who used it as a heavy accessory lift to replace front squats in certain off-season programs. The lift became widely known as the Bulgarian split squat after strength coaches like Mike Boyle helped bring it into the mainstream, especially among athletes looking to improve sport-specific power without the spinal loading of barbell back squats.

Today, split squats are everywhere from beginner workouts to elite training rooms and there are multiple ways to do them. Two of the most popular variations are the front foot elevated split squat and the rear foot elevated split squat. At first glance, the difference in setup seems minor: one raises the front foot a few inches, the other elevates the back foot on a bench. But those small changes lead to big differences in how each version loads the body, what muscles they emphasize, and how they feel in practice.

So which one should you use—and when?

Let’s break down how these two variations differ, what they’re best for, and how to program them into your workouts depending on your goals.

The Setup: What Actually Changes?

The front foot elevated split squat (FFESS) is a subtle but powerful progression of the traditional split squat. In this variation, your front foot is placed on a small platform—usually 2 to 6 inches off the ground—while your back foot stays grounded behind you. At first glance, the setup might not seem like a major change, but the effects are significant.

By elevating the front foot, you increase the range of motion through the hip, knee, and ankle joints, allowing for a deeper descent and more mechanical tension on the working leg. This deeper angle places a greater stretch on the glutes and hamstrings, which makes it especially valuable for hypertrophy and mobility work. It's also one of the few lower body exercises that combines strength with end-range control, something many lifters overlook until movement restrictions start showing up in other lifts or daily life.

Originally used more in physical therapy and mobility training, this variation has recently gained traction in strength programs thanks to its versatility. It’s particularly useful for anyone with tight hips, limited ankle dorsiflexion, or a history of back or knee issues that make traditional squats uncomfortable. The FFESS can be loaded with dumbbells, kettlebells, or even performed bodyweight for mobility-focused sessions. And because of the increased depth, your core and stabilizers have to work overtime to keep you balanced and aligned.

In short: it’s a small adjustment with a big return, especially if your goals include building strong, mobile hips, developing glute strength, or bulletproofing your lower body against injury.

In contrast, the rear foot elevated split squat (RFESS)—more commonly known as the Bulgarian split squat—flips the setup entirely. Instead of raising the front foot, your rear foot is positioned on a bench or box behind you, while your front foot remains grounded. This creates a longer, more open stance that immediately tests your balance and increases the mechanical demand on the front leg.

What makes this variation so effective is how it shifts the majority of the workload onto the lead leg, especially the quadriceps, while also engaging the gluteus maximus, hamstrings, and adductors to assist with hip extension and stability. Because the elevated rear foot provides minimal support, the front leg is responsible for generating force and maintaining control throughout the entire movement. This makes the RFESS a powerful tool for developing unilateral strength, addressing muscular imbalances, and building muscular endurance.

The roots of this exercise are often traced back to Eastern European weightlifting programs, particularly among Bulgarian Olympic lifters, who sought ways to build leg strength without the compressive spinal loading of heavy barbell squats. Since then, it has become a favorite among strength coaches and athletes for its versatility, accessibility, and transfer to sport performance.

Beyond just building strength, the RFESS presents a unique challenge to balance and proprioception. The rear foot elevation creates an inherently unstable position, which demands activation from the core musculature—including the rectus abdominis, obliques, and erector spinae—as well as smaller stabilizing muscles like the gluteus medius, tensor fasciae latae (TFL), and peroneals in the lower leg to maintain alignment and prevent compensatory shifts.

In short, while both the FFESS and RFESS fall under the umbrella of split squats, they load the body in very different ways. The shift in foot position alters joint angles, muscle emphasis, and neuromuscular demand, creating distinct training outcomes. The key is knowing how, and when, to use each variation to meet your specific goals.

What Does the Research Say?

A 2020 study published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research compared muscle activation between different split squat variations. The researchers found that the rear foot elevated split squat elicited significantly greater activation in the rectus femoris (a major quad muscle) compared to traditional and front foot elevated versions. This makes the Bulgarian split squat a clear winner if quad development is your main goal.

However, another study from Clinical Biomechanics in 2017 highlighted that increasing the range of motion at the hip — as you do in a front foot elevated split squat — leads to greater gluteal activation, particularly during the eccentric (lowering) phase. This makes FFESS an excellent option when your focus is posterior chain development, glute hypertrophy, or improving mobility and control in the hips.

In short:

• RFESS = Higher quad activation and more balance challenge

• FFESS = Greater hip range of motion and glute activation

When Should You Use Each One?

If your main goal is building stronger, more powerful glutes or if you’ve been dealing with tight hips or limited ankle mobility the front foot elevated split squat is an excellent choice. The extra depth can help restore end-range control and improve hip function, especially when performed slowly with light to moderate weight.

If you’re trying to grow your quads, improve your balance and stability, or challenge yourself with heavier loads, the rear foot elevated split squat might be your go-to. It’s also ideal in settings where you want to create a lot of tension without needing a barbell or large equipment setup.

You don’t have to choose one forever. In fact, both can be worked into a smart, progressive training plan depending on what phase you're in.

How to Program Them Effectively

To get the most out of split squat variations, it’s important to align them with your overall training goals whether that’s building muscle, gaining strength, improving mobility, or addressing imbalances. Because both the front foot and rear foot elevated split squats are demanding in slightly different ways, they can be programmed at different intensities, tempos, and points in your workout depending on what you want to prioritize.

The RFESS tends to be better suited as a primary lift in lower-body or full-body strength programs due to its high loading potential and recruitment of large muscle groups. Meanwhile, the FFESS works well as an accessory lift for glute development, range-of-motion training, or injury prevention, especially when tempo or control is the focus.

You can alternate which one takes priority depending on the phase you’re in or even use both in the same session just at different levels of intensity. Below is a sample progression for both hypertrophy and strength-focused training blocks.

💪 Muscle Building (Hypertrophy) Phase

Weeks 1–4 Focus: Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat primary
Weeks 5–8 Focus: Switch to Front Foot Elevated Split Squat emphasis

🔄 Full Body Hypertrophy Workout (Week 2)

1. Dumbbell Bench Press – 4×10

2. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat – 3×8/leg

3. Lat Pulldown – 3×12

4. Lateral Band Walks – 2×10 steps/side

5. Front Foot Elevated Split Squat – 2×12–15/leg

6. Cable Woodchops – 3×10/side

🦵 Lower Body Hypertrophy Workout (Week 2)

1. Hip Thrust – 4×10

2. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat – 3×8–10/leg

3. Lateral Lunge – 3×10/side

4. Front Foot Elevated Split Squat – 2×15/leg

5. Banded Clamshells – 2×15/side

6. Side Plank with Reach-Through – 2×8/side

🔄 Full Body Hypertrophy Workout (Week 6)

1. Incline Dumbbell Press – 3×12

2. Front Foot Elevated Split Squat – 3×10–12/leg (3-sec eccentric)

3. Standing Single-Arm Cable Row – 3×10/side

4. Lateral Step-Ups – 2×10/leg

5. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat – 2×12/leg (light goblet hold)

6. Half-Kneeling Cable Chop – 3×10/side

🦵 Lower Body Hypertrophy Workout (Week 6)

1. Barbell RDL – 3×8

2. Front Foot Elevated Split Squat – 3×10/leg

3. Cossack Squats – 3×8/side

4. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat – 2×12/leg

5. Rotational Deadbugs – 2×10/side

6. Standing Calf Raise – 3×15

🏋️ Strength-Focused Phase

Weeks 1–4 Focus: RFESS heavy
Weeks 5–8 Focus: Add pauses + switch FFESS to posterior chain support

🔄 Full Body Strength Workout (Week 2)

1. Trap Bar Deadlift – 4×5

2. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat – 4×5/leg

3. Push Press – 3×5

4. Lateral Lunge – 2×8/side

5. Rotational Landmine Press – 3×6/side

6. Suitcase Carry – 2×40 steps

🦵 Lower Body Strength Workout (Week 2)

1. Back Squat – 4×5

2. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat – 4×6/leg

3. Lateral Sled Drag or Banded Lateral Walks – 2×20 steps

4. Front Foot Elevated Split Squat – 2×8/leg

5. Cable Anti-Rotation Hold – 2×30 sec/side

6. Single-Leg Calf Raise – 3×12

🔄 Full Body Strength Workout (Week 6)

1. Barbell Deadlift – 4×5

2. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat (with pause) – 3×5/leg

3. Single-Leg RDL – 3×8/leg

4. Chin-Ups with Twist – 3×6

5. Tall-Kneeling Rotational Med Ball Throw – 3×6/side

6. Farmer Carry – 2×40 steps

🦵 Lower Body Strength Workout (Week 6)

1. Front Squat – 4×5

2. Rear Foot Elevated Split Squat (with pause) – 3×5/leg

3. Step-Ups with Rotation – 3×6/side

4. Lateral Lunge to Knee Drive – 3×8/side

5. Cable Anti-Rotation Press (Pallof) – 2×10/side

6. Side Plank Row (Band or Cable) – 2×10/side

Coaching Tips

With the front foot elevated version, the biggest mistake I see is rushing the depth or losing alignment at the knee. Make sure you’re staying balanced through your full foot and not collapsing in. Move slowly, especially on the way down.

In the Bulgarian, watch for overextending the back leg or leaning forward excessively. The setup matters here: a bench that’s too high can strain your hip flexor or throw off your balance. A lower box (12–16") is usually better for most people.

So, Which One’s Better?

It depends on your goal.

• Use the front foot elevated split squat if you want more glute involvement, deeper range of motion, and improved mobility.

• Choose the rear foot elevated split squat if you’re after quad gains, balance challenge, or more loading potential.

Better yet? Rotate between them based on your training block. Each variation offers unique benefits, and your body thrives on well-structured variety, especially when it’s applied with purpose.

Whether you're focused on strength, hypertrophy, mobility, or balance, both the front foot and rear foot elevated split squats can deserve a place in your training. By understanding the mechanics and muscle demands of each, you can use them strategically to create a more effective and well-rounded program. Small changes in setup can lead to big differences in outcome and when it comes to training smart, that nuance is everything.

Hope that helps,

Happy Exercising!

Robyn

References

1. Schoenfeld, B. J. (2010). The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(10), 2857–2872. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e840f3

2. Dingley, A. A., Pyne, D. B., Young, W. B., & Hooper, S. L. (2007). The effects of training on muscle activation during a Bulgarian split squat. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(2), 479–485.

3. McCurdy, K., Walker, J., Langford, G., Kutz, M., Guerrero, J., & McMillan, J. (2005). The effects of unilateral vs. bilateral lower-body resistance training on strength, single-leg jump performance, and limb asymmetry. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 9–15.

4. Speirs, D. E., Bennett, M. A., Finn, C. V., & Turner, A. P. (2016). Unilateral vs. bilateral squat training for strength, sprints, and agility in academy rugby players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(2), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001090

5. Contreras, B., & Schoenfeld, B. J. (2011). To crunch or not to crunch: An evidence-based examination of spinal flexion exercises, their potential risks, and their applicability to program design. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 33(4), 8–18.

6. Baechle, T. R., & Earle, R. W. (2008). Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (3rd ed.). National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA).

7. Behm, D. G., & Sale, D. G. (1993). Velocity specificity of resistance training. Sports Medicine, 15(6), 374–388.

8. Youdas, J. W., Hollman, J. H., & Krause, D. A. (2006). The influence of gender and technique on gluteus maximus and hamstring muscle activation during a forward lunge. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20(2), 362–368.